Originally Published PMPN March 2001
Sophisticated Packaging for Clinical Trials
Packaging for clinical trials materials is becoming a complex
challenge.
Jenevieve Blair Polin, Contributing Editor
 |
| Quintiles International provides packaging, labeling, and distribution services for patient administration at investigational sites worldwide.
|
The scope of clinical trials is vast, with some studies enrolling tens
of thousands of patients in 15 or more countries. With so much at stake,
clinical trial materials packaging takes on great importance. A well-designed
package can increase compliance, reduce wastage, and shorten the study
timeline.
CHILD-RESISTANT PACKAGING
Recent decisions by the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission
(CPSC) to enforce child-resistant (CR) packaging regulations for clinical
trial materials have shaken up the industry. On May 23, 2000, CPSC issued
a statement mandating CR packaging for all oral-dosage clinical trial
drugs dispensed for home use that are toxic enough to harm a young child.
Packaging in studies that began after November 23, 2000, must comply.
Manufacturers whose primary packaging is not CR temporarily have the
option of simply putting the primary package into a CR outer container
(15 CFR section 1700.15) as a stop-gap measure. After May 23,
2002, however, the primary packaging in all new clinical trials of these
types of drugs must be CR.
While achieving child resistance for a bottle is straightforward,
the CPSC mandate challenged contract packagers of blister cards to respond
with a variety of innovations. A blister package design may incorporate
at least one of the CR features described in ASTM D-3475 or be tested
and meet the requirements for child resistance. CR blister cards, including
the patented SlidePack and the E-Ztear packages from PCI Services (Philadelphia),
have been available for years.
The trick is to design a blister card that is not only CR but
also senior friendly. Many designers believe the best way to achieve
this goal is to incorporate steps that require cognitive skills rather
than brute force. "Children don't do sequential operations very well,"
notes Efrem Zaret, director of quality assurance for Almedica (Allendale,
NJ), "so if you have three separate operations, like a peel, another
peel, and a push, that would probably be CR."
The leading approved package that meets these criteria is the
Dosepak, developed by Westvaco Corp.'s Mebane Packaging subsidiary (Mebane,
NC). The Dosepak consists of an outer carton with a locking feature
that is permanently wedded to an inner carton, the traditional blister
card, which slides out and unfolds.
Mebane Packaging offers the option of adding a tear-resistant
laminate to the outer carton to increase child resistance for highly
toxic substances. "We can also work with the substrate to add a tear-resistant
additive and other things to make it more difficult for children to
tear into the package with their teeth or fingers or anything they may
be given during the testing phase," adds Tim Freeze, manager of products,
solutions, and systems for Mebane.
The package composition can also incorporate light or moisture
barriers if needed. The Dosepak works with blister cards made from a
variety of materials including Aclar. "The blister card is overlayed
with Printkote EasySeal Plus, Westvaco's patented extrusion coated paperboard,
which seals at low temperatures with short dwell times and adheres consistently
to foils and films," explains Angela O'Neal, Mebane's marketing services
manager.
Many contract packagers are putting their own blister cards in
the Dosepak unit. "We have partnered with Westvaco, making slight modifications
so the Dosepak works much better for a lot of our specific packaging
types," says Mike McNear, vice president, customer services, for Fisher
Clinical Services (Allentown, PA), formerly Covance Pharmaceutical Packaging
Services.
Most packagers are also developing their own CR blister card
designs. McNear says Fisher expects to have approval on some patented
solutions within the next six months. Almedica has partnered with their
vendors to develop a CR blister card that meets the requirements of
the CPSC, according to Hans Engel, Almedica's buyer, and Laura Pedrick,
Almedica's graphic designer. Clinical Trial Services (CTS; Audubon,
PA) has also developed a CR blister card.
Comar (Vineland, NJ) is working on an innovative CR closure system
that is neither a bottle nor a blister pack. "Most of the approaches
that are successful are going to be outside of those formats," predicts
Phil Waegelin, director of Comar's Contract Packaging Division.
Despite these innovations, many contract packagers are reassuring
their customers that the changes required are actually minimal. "Our
new design," says Tim Brewer, CEO of CTS, "won't change our process
one bit. Strip placement will be the same, and the size of the blister
card shouldn't increase much. The cost shouldn't go up, and the timeline
shouldn't increase."
Clinical Trials Operations Improved With Robot-based
Packaging
System
 |
| The Trialpack packaging system
uses the Klöckner
Medipak EAS unit-dose blister packager. |
Because clinical trials deal with human health, the accuracy
of drug delivery is of utmost importance. "As pharmacists, we
must be certain that we're not only delivering the correct drug,
but also the correct amount of medicine for every dose the patient
takes," says Dan Beechuk, who has worked in the clinical trials
area for 35 years and has managed the Clinical Pharmaceutical
Operation of Pfizer (Ann Arbor, MI) for the past 20 years. For
a long time, though, he was convinced that there was a way to
improve packaging speed without sacrificing accuracy, and he
even worked with students from an engineering school to look
at the possibility of using robots for mechanical placement.
Traditional methods for creating clinical trial packages
with multiple substances required several steps and manual assembly.
First, each drug was blister packaged in its own tray. If there
were three different drugs or three different strengths of the
same drug, then three different sets of trays were created,
handled separately, inventoried, stored, then cut into strips,
and hand assembled into the final configuration on a unit-dose
card according to the trial regimen. Besides the time-consuming
manual assembly, a substantial amount of handling was involved
in this process.
The Trialpack robot-based blister packaging system from
Zurich-based Fleximationrepresented in the U.S. exclusively
by Klöckner Medipak (Clearwater, FL)was the solution
for Pfizer. Installed at the end of 1999, the Trialpack system
incorporates a Klöckner Medipak EAS unit-dose blister packager
and a robot- based filling system, capable of accurately placing
up to four different products in complex, double-blind, randomized
clinical trials.
The idea for the Trialpack system was the feasible solution
to a common problem. "While I was working for another robotic
company," explains Matthias Vogelsanger, founder and president
of Fleximation, "I worked on a custom robotic filling system
for clinical trial blister packs for a Swiss pharmaceutical
company. I realized there was a real need for an even better,
commercially available system." And so he created the Trialpack
system. Exceptional flexibility, safety, on-line quality control,
and fast and easy setup for the small batch sizes typical of
clinical trials were his design parameters, along with keeping
special tooling at a minimum to make the system more affordable.
"Klöckner Medipak's EAS unit-dose blister packager
was already the preferred machine for clinical trial packaging
operations," notes Vogelsanger. "The EAS machine also offered
inexpensive tooling and the ability to configure packs via software."
And so, Klöckner Medipak became the exclusive North American
representative of the Trialpack system in March 2000.
Currently, Pfizer's Clinical Pharmacy Operation's blisters
are standardized on Pentapharm alfoil PVdC- coated vinyl film
from Klöckner Barrier Films. The Packaging Development
division of the company selected Klöckner materials more
than 10 years ago, when the first Medipak EAS machine was acquired
there. "We wanted to take the conservative route and pull all
of our clinical trial products in high-barrier materials," explains
Monica Schiksnis, manager of package development.
While clinical trials have varying complexities and therefore
distinctive packages, Pfizer's Clinical Pharmaceutical Operation's
packaging engineer Rick Klepek estimates that for a package
with a medium complexity level it generally takes a total of
3 days and 23 people to produce, handle, inventory, and
cut up the trays, and another 2 people to hand assemble the
final unit-dose packages. This compares to the approximately
6 hours that Trialpack requires to do the same job. "Up until
now we've had two operators on the new robotic system, one to
watch the machine and keep the product and material levels full,
the other to inspect every blister," says Klepek. "But the truth
is the machine is totally automatic, and we can cut down to
one operator."
"The new robotic Trialpack system actually takes more
time to create each unit-dose package with multiple drugs than
a conventional blister packaging machine takes to create a tray
of one type of drug," says Beechuk. "But it is eliminating all
those subsequent steps and handling, as well as the manual assembly
of cards that gives us the big time savings. With the robotic
system, we can work with the different drugs simultaneously
and create the final package in one step." In addition, the
unit-dose package also helps ensure compliance with the trial
regimen, explains Beechuk.
Instead of allocating, inspecting, and cutting apart
trays of single product, the preparation process before a production
run using the Trialpack system includes half an hour of designing
the packing pattern on PC-based software. This consists of defining
the pattern of tablets and capsules and the wording to be printed
(such as morning, noon, evening, and day
1, day 2, etc.). The production file is then loaded
onto the Trialpack system. Using system prompts, the operator
can load up to four different tablets and capsules into safety-locked
feeders. The feeders require no change parts to accommodate
different types of products, so setup time is less than 20 minutes.
The product travels on conveyors from the feeders to
the robot with a vacuum-operated gripper, which locates each
tablet or capsule on the conveyor using information from the
integrated vision system and places it in the appropriate blister
cavity. The robotic feeder can handle up to 54 products per
minute; however, the complexity of the pattern and the number
of days of the particular clinical trial govern the speed of
the machine at any point in time. Each blister cavity is checked
before placing product inside, and correct placement is verified
with the vision system using data from the production file.
If the system detects an error, it automatically rejects the
blister package. All errors and other quality-related events
are automatically logged to provide full documentation for every
batch. The system can also print information on the foil-lidding
material on the back of the blister.
Not only is the system saving time and labor costs, but
"we're also running at 98% and higher efficiencies, some days
100%," says Klepek. "On two production runs this past week,
one of 300 packages, the other of 240, we had zero scrap. The
only time we've had any waste was during QA tests when we tore
apart packages to check them."
"Now that we're part of Pfizer, we're going to get even
busier," predicts Klepek. "With the efficiency of the Trialpack
system, we'll be able to bring Pfizer's clinical trials in-house."
Klepek estimates this will cut the cost of packaging Pfizer's
trials in half.
As for Beechuk, who had the vision to pursue a more efficient,
robotic solution: "We always thought robotics were the way to
go. We're pleased that we finally have a machine that allows
us to have a very sophisticated model for handling as complicated
a study as we can design, one that lets us handle more than
one drug at a time and one that can do it accurately and reliably."
|
BOTTLES AND BLISTER CARDS
Cost can be a sensitive issue and may affect the choice between
bottles and blister cards. "We have gotten cost estimates ranging from
$7.50 to $10.00 for a CR card," points out Sandy Richwalski, Almedica's
director of operations, "whereas a bottling job can be done for far
less."
The packaging costs, however, account for a very small percentage
of the costs of a clinical trial. "Most of our clients don't want to
skimp on the cost of packaging if it might have any chance of affecting
the validity of the clinical trial," notes Tom Jeatran, director of
clinical trial materials for Cook Pharmaceutical Solutions (Bloomington,
IN). In general, the use of blister cards over bottles can increase
compliance.
Chances are that the packaging format may change as the product
itself evolves in the development process. Companies may conduct Phase
I studies with the powder form of an active substance before they develop
it into a capsule or tablet. "With some components, it's a lot easier
to then go into a capsule formulation for Phase II studies and develop
a tablet formulation later," explains Martin Page, director of operations
for PCI UK Clinical Services facility (Manchester, England). The package
may follow suit, changing from a bottle for the powder to a blister
for Phase II studies, and then back to a bottle for Phase III if the
company's intention is to market the final product in bottles. "During
the clinical phase, a company will often go for the more protective
materials, but when it comes to commercialization it will look for the
cheapest possible material that provides the required barrier properties,"
Page adds.
The choice "can also be driven by what is convenient, what is
quick, and of course what you have stability in," says Sean Smith, COO
of clinical supplies at Quintiles International (Glasgow, Scotland).
 |
| The E-Ztear package from PCI Services
meets child-resistance
requirements. |
Blister cards are de rigueur for studies with multiple drugs and complicated
dosage regimens. "The more dosage forms the patient is expected to take
in a given period, the more you need a blister card so that you can
visually represent how the dosing should be done," says Fisher's McNear.
"The multiproduct blister card not only reduces the number of steps
that you have to take in packaging, but also in some cases, it decreases
the lead time needed for some complex components," he adds.
"Almedica in Europe is able to package at least three products
in the same blister," says Martin Noblet, director of marketing for
Almedica. "With good blister-card design and multiple product filling,
we are able to meet customers' requirements in about 90% of study protocols."
Bottles and blister cards are the mainstays of clinical trial materials
packaging, but some new drugs demand alternative packaging. Many biotech
drugs, explains Cook's Jeatran, are peptides or proteins that must be
injected rather than administered orally.
INVENTORY CONTROL
Far more important than the cost of the package is the cost of the
investigational drug itself, which may also be in short supply. "Flexibility
in clinical supply is very much the buzzword at the moment," says Quintiles's
Smith. "I want to be able to produce 15,000 kits and send them anywhere
in the world."
Interactive voice-response systems (IVRS) and medical identity
numbers reduce material wastage and improve supply. Quintiles, Covance,
Almedica, and CTS all offer IVRS. Cook's Jeatran holds a patent on IVRS,
which he developed when he was working for Eli Lilly and Co. (Indianapolis).
Jeatran explains, "By using IVRS, you can cut the amount of material
you need for a clinical study by at least a quarter, but sometimes as
much as two-thirds."
Sometimes, however, a company saves money by not using an IVRS.
"We have a manual call randomization center, so if it's a small study
and the drug is very expensive, we may save the client money by doing
the randomization manually," reveals CTS's Brewer.
Last year CTS bought Applied Clinical Concepts Inc. (Durham,
NC), which is now known as CTS Durham. This division tightly manages
drug supplies for studies. "They'll package a study with 5% overage.
Most studies are packaging 2050% overage," Brewer boasts.
Booklet labels are another way to minimize the inventory required.
By attaching a booklet label containing 15 languages, for instance,
explains Smith, "you've got one single stand-alone inventory item as
opposed to 15."
Richwalski estimates that Almedica has provided labels in at
least 35 languages, using its proprietary Almedica Drug Labeling System
software. "We were the first label software company out there in clinical
trials, so this is second nature to us," she says.
Multilingual booklet labeling has its pitfalls, though. "You
may have approvals on five or six of the 13 languages you want to put
on a label," warns Brewer, "but without the rest, you can't start the
label. We've seen those things delay studies by months." In such cases,
he suggests that a client group the approved languages on a smaller
booklet label and proceed with the study in those countries. When the
rest of the languages are approved, the client may print a second booklet
label.
For even greater flexibility and control over clinical supply, Quintiles
has opened a series of 13 global depots. By June of this year, each
will be fully audited as a GMP facility. The company may then send study
drugs to a depot, where they will be held under controlled conditions.
"If recruitment in that country isn't running as we wanted, we can bring
that drug back and allocate it to another part of the world because
we've documented and guaranteed its control," Smith says.
EARLY CONSULTATION PAYS OFF
Contract packagers stress the importance of coming onboard early
in the design process. "A lot of clients tend to think of clinical trial
materials management as just a packaging operation," says Almedica's
Noblet, "but the reality is we're increasingly a professional service
organization, providing overall project management."
If these professionals look at the protocol, with their expertise
they can suggest the best packaging design for that trial. "Then you're
going to get the best compliance and have the best chance of getting
it packaged on time," says Fisher's McNear.
With advance notice, packagers can secure components or provide additional
designs. "The sooner we get involved in the process," McNear sums up,
"the more elegant and the more technical the solution can be."
Copyright ©2001 Pharmaceutical & Medical Packaging News