Skip to : [Content] [Navigation]
 

MARKET ANALYSIS

This is an archive of older medical device market studies. For the latest studies, see our Main Market Research Page.

Older Studies

Drug Delivery Drives Growth in Medical Materials

Advances in plastics and polymers, surface modification, gels and membranes, metals, ceramics, biologicals, and biomaterials are having a great impact on the medical devices market. New materials for implants, adhesives, imaging agents, and drug delivery systems are moving rapidly out of the laboratory and into the hospital and clinic. According to a Business Communications Co., Inc., publication, Medical Materials Industry Review, the market for select medical materials and devices amounted to about $26 billion in 1998. By 2000, BCC analysts predict a $30.5 billion industry.
        Drug-delivery systems represent the largest market for medical materials; this sector is expected to hit $14.5 billion in 2003, thanks to an annual average growth rate (AAGR) of 8%. Transplant components represent both the smallest market—$180 million in 1998—and the fastest-growing, with an AAGR of 11.1% from 1998 to 2000. The market for medical packaging materials was worth $3.8 billion in 1998, and should top $4.1 billion in 2000, spurred by a 4.7% AAGR. Catheters represent another lucrative market, growing from $2.3 billion in 1998 to $2.8 billion in 2000—an AAGR of 8.4%. Angioplasty products represented a market of 1.3 billion in 1998, and this sector is expected to top $1.4 billion in 2000. Incontinence products, kits, and trays created a market for materials worth $1.2 billion in 1998. The market for heart valves, worth $300 million in 98, such reach $330 million in 2000.
        While some observers may consider these growth rates somewhat high, the researchers note that figures are in current dollars. Moreover, derived regulatory effects will help force prices up, as costs of compliance will increase.
top of page

Visit Business Communications Co.

*   *   *

Clear Growth Seen for Ultrasound Market

Overall, the US ultrasound market experienced minimal growth in 1994 and 1995, hovering around $710 million. Then, in 1996, the growth rate rose to 5.6% and the market value topped $755 million. Innovations in 1997 pushed the market value above $820 million, fueling a vigorous annual growth rate of 8%. Though 1998 experienced slower growth than 1997, the market still grew strongly, at a rate of 7.5%, to $881 million.
        Today, the diagnostic imaging market is a dynamic field. Imaging modalities are virtually competing with each other to provide the highest quality, greatest flexibility, lowest price, and greatest innovation. According to a new report from Datamonitor, Trends & Dynamics In US Ultrasound 1999, several developments promise to keep the imaging sector moving forward. The advent of PACS (picture archiving communications systems) is gradually reshaping radiology, allowing hospitals to conform to a more efficient and cost-effective design. Teleradiology, which lets physicians view scans and patient files from remote locations, promises to change the structure of the hospital system and influence the way healthcare is delivered worldwide. The introduction and almost immediate embrace of digital x-ray and computed radiography is a prime example of how quickly new imaging technologies can secure the attention and trust of end users.
        In fact, the radiology ultrasound market is expected to continue the growth it experienced over the past two years. Although growth will decelerate, it should remain quite strong, leveling out at 6.9% by 2003. The compound annual growth rate should hit 7.2% between 1999 and 2003, while the market value should reach $381 million in 1999 and $504 million by 2003. Strong growth will be driven by the increased capabilities in radiology imaging such as contrast harmonic imaging and 3-D imaging. Though these developments affect primarily the premium and high-end market segments, the mid- and low-end segments should also benefit. The premium and high-end segments, however, are both aimed at the same target audience; this competition is expected to find the premium segment initially outpacing the high-end systems in value and volume growth, as hospitals, anticipating further developments in ultrasound and contrast, seek the highest quality tools for imaging.
        The computed tomography market has similarly reinvented itself, as technology progressed from rotational scanning to spiral scanning and then to multidetector-array scanning. Each innovation has cut down on procedure time and cost while improving imaging quality. New developments in the magnetic resonance market include the increasing flexibility and capabilities of open MRI systems, innovations in contrast imaging, and explorations into handheld devices and functional and cardiac MRI. Nonetheless, nuclear medicine has managed to retain its status as the gold standard in cardiac imaging.
        The ultrasound equipment market is closely related to the contrast media market, and the introduction of new media should have a dramatic effect—particularly un the high-end cardiology and radiology segments. To a certain extent, increased investment in ultrasound hardware is necessary to make the best use of ultrasound contrast media, because expensive high-end units display the contrast-enhancement effect more clearly. For demanding applications like myocardial perfusion imaging, high-quality machines are required to provide consistent diagnostically conclusive results. These machines will use a variety of technological options, such as Power Doppler and Harmonic Imaging.
        The global ultrasound contrast media market is still in early stages of development—testing, developing and commercializing new products. Existing agents are of reasonably good quality, but the market for them has not taken off. Industry commentators believe that these agents are not worth a large investment at this time because it appears that they will be superseded by the next generation of agents shortly. Moreover, physicians are also relatively reluctant to use the products because of the high price tag. The new generation of ultrasound contrast agents are also likely to be expensive, but their improved functionality and clinical usefulness could outweigh cost concerns.
top of page

Visit DataMonitor

*   *   *


Even more market studies