Originally Published MX May/June 2002
ADVERTISING, DISTRIBUTION, & SALES
Corporate Branding in the Wake of AcquisitionsFor medtech manufacturers, integrating new and existing companies under a single, unified brand can pay long-term dividends.
Ken DeLor
Building a Foundation for a Strong Brand
During the 1980s,
corporations bought smaller companies that were very different, and put them
into holding companies. And in that less-global climate, without the open borders
of today, those corporations could do very well without directing each individual
member company. That is not the case today. In today's environment, companies
are buying complementary companies in order to become broad and deepand
thereby to withstand the withering blows of international competition.
But according to KPMG Consulting (McLean, VA), nearly 83% of mergers have historically
not delivered on anticipated value.1 This is most often because deals
touting efficiencies of scale rarely rise to the level of expectations. Successful
mergers and acquisitions focus on integrating companies with synergistic services
or products, and then explaining that synergy to the market.
Discovering and understanding where the synergies lie are essential steps toward
building an effective positioning platform. But to successfully implement such
a branding platform, one must also have a firm base of knowledge about the company
and the ways it is perceived by a variety of stakeholders. Such an understanding
can best be achieved by conducting interviews with members of the financial
community, company employees, and the company's customer base, and submitting
the results to careful analysis. This has been the starting point used by The
DeLor Group (Louisville, KY) in its work for such medtech companies as Élan
Pharmaceutical, Mallinckrodt, and others.
The more diverse a company becomes, the harder it is for the market to understand
what it does. Companies must be able to explain their array of products and
divisions in a way that makes sense to the marketplace. Branding helps bundle
those products and unique selling points in visual and verbal ways to show that
what may appear diverse is actually complementary.
Branding is about creating differentiation and determining both the core promise
and the personality of an organization. It's the promise that tells the customer
what a company does and how the company does it better. It is the personality
that permeates through a company and its products, making the organization unique
to the marketplace and inviting customers to create a relationship with a brand.
In a highly competitive market such as that for medical devices, differentiation
must mean more than simply identifying product features and benefits. It means
identifying what's at the core of a company's messagewhat makes its brand
uniqueand creating a distinct and memorable visual attitude that conveys
that message at every touch point.
Fulfilling the M&A Promise
The newly formed
organization needs to communicate one vision, one identity, and one strategy.
First, the company must understand the equity it has in each individual entity
and their products and services. In some cases, the acquiring-company brand
has the most equity, so the acquired companies lose their individual brands
and are wrapped under the stronger brand of the acquirer. For instance, General
Electric is such a powerful brand that it can retain its brand while bringing
in other medical companies. GE Medical Systems could simply absorb acquisitions
under its name without holding those units as separate entities.
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
|
Out
of many, one. As part of the rebranding of its component companies, the
new green and dark blue Élan Pharmaceutical logo replaced a number
of older company logos (top).
|
|
Sometimes an acquired
product will have such equity that it overshadows the corporate identity. In
such cases, it makes sense to retain the equity in the product while still tying
in the corporate connection. When Mallinckrodt acquired the respiratory product
giant Nellcor Puritan Bennett (NPB), for instance, our firm helped Mallinckrodt
to reposition itself and sort out its brand architecture. The equity in NPB
was so strong that we recommended it be retained as a divisional brand. This
strategy permitted the strength of the NPB identity to gradually transfer to
Mallinckrodt, thereby reinforcing the corporate brand.
But in other instances, a merged company will seek a new brand to better represent
its new personality. The large combined company may be willing to give up the
equity in the acquired companies for the long-term gain of having one united
brandeven if it means developing a unique name separate from any of the
original companies. That's called bravery. Examples in other industries include
Gulf Oil, which gave up its well-known U.S. name to become BP. Taking this route
requires an extraordinary commitment to communicationboth within the company
and with those outside the company's walls.
Projects of this nature are perceptual and objective, and everyone involved
will have ideas and opinions. This is another reason why it is essential to
first conduct thorough research and develop a strong strategic plan.
Research Determines Direction
The ultimate goal
is to put forward a single corporate brand that will permeate all corporate
communications. There is only one brand to manage and promote, which ultimately
makes it easier for the financial community, employees, and current and future
customers to grasp.
Analysts determine which companies are successful by examining products coming
down the pipeline, so it is important that this audience knows that the whole
is greater than the sum of the parts. The financial community needs to see the
big picturewhat the company is doing as a whole, and where it intends
to go. This is why one effective brand that encompasses all areas is necessary.
Employees also are important players in a merger or acquisition. When Siemens
Medical Engineering Group announced a definitive agreement to acquire Acuson
Corp. for an estimated $700 million, for instance, "employee morale and
employee retention and integration issues" were among the chief risks listed
as having the potential to delay or hinder the completion of the megadeal.
According to the management consultancy firm of A.T. Kearney (Chicago), the
greatest barrier to integration during a merger or acquisition is failure to
achieve employee commitment.2 Employees are typically the last to
find out about a merger or acquisition, and the unknown can create a significant
amount of fear, causing them to pursue opportunities elsewhere.
Companies need to let employees know how a merger or acquisition will affect
them and how it will affect the acquired company's successand give them
something to embrace as they become part of a new enterprise. That is when the
company needs to develop materials to tell employees what is going on with the
merger.
In some cases, the employee base is so valuable that its retention is a primary
goal. The sales force should be treated as a separate entity from other employees,
requiring separate branding communications. These individuals are on the front
lines carrying the message and the products to the customer, so they must understand
why the deal was necessary, how the new products are related, and the benefits
to the customers.
A study recently conducted at Northwestern University (Evanston, IL) supports
this notion.3 According to Patricia Whalen, PhD, an assistant professor
in the integrated marketing communications program at Northwestern's Medill
School of Journalism, due diligence should include an examination of how employees
will be affected and how information is distributed to them. Managing such factors,
she notes, is particularly important to firms "whose most valuable assets
walk out the door each day." The study also concluded that communicating
the motives underlying a merger or acquisition was perhaps more important than
detailing the nuts and bolts of the deal.
Similarly, the customer base must make the connection between the formerly separate
companies and the advantages provided by the larger, merged company. It must
be clear and easy for anyone to understand the company's reasoning and strategy,
and to accept the new organization as an expert in its field.
Putting the Brand in Motion
Upon implementing
a new brand, a company must tailor launch communications to its target audiences.
Such an effort means developing separate strategies designed especially to meet
the information needs of such stakeholders as market analysts, customers, the
sales force, and employees. The portfolio of communication materials should
include a consistent strategic and visual presence, bringing all pieces under
one umbrella that naturally ties them all together.
Fortunately, an effective core brand builds a foundation for a consistent visual
presence. Companies know when it has been done correctly, because communication
to a variety of audiences ceases to be a struggle and starts to make sense.
The sales launch meeting has provided The DeLor Group one of the most powerful
opportunities to create the brand experience and communicate the new brand message.
Such a multimedia eventaided by a launch kit, sales training, and specialty
itemseducates and motivates the sales force, who in turn become the brand's
best ambassadors.
Communication must also be planned and implemented to operate at various local
and regional levels. This consideration can be especially important for global
corporations that are more likely to encounter and have to deal with difficulties
arising from cultural differences. Typography, trademark issues, and logistics
become increasingly important when a corporate brand is rolled out globally.
An Investment in the Future
The globalization
of the medical device industry has spurred a number of mergers and acquisitions.
In such a changing industry, branding is becoming increasingly important. Given
the high stakes and expectations for such consolidated enterprises, companies
cannot afford to ignore the one thing that can often carry them through good
times and bad: a solid reputation built on a brand that truly reflects the promise
and personality of the company, its people, and its products.
Properly defining and communicating a company's brand message requires a significant
investment of time and resources into the tasks of research, analysis, and planning.
However, successful completion of such an effort will pay dividends in customer
retention and growth, employee loyalty, and company value over the life of the
enterprise.
References
1.
World-Class Transaction Survey (McLean, VA: KPMG Consulting, 2001).
2. After the Merger: Seven Rules for Post-Merger Integration (Chicago:
A.T. Kearney, 1999).
3. P Whalen, "How Communication Drives Success," in International
Association of Business Communicators Research Foundation Home Page [on-line]
(San Francisco: IABC Research Foundation, 2001 [cited 15 April 2002]); available
from Internet: http://www.iabc.com/fdtnweb/merger.html.
Ken DeLor is president of The DeLor Group (Louisville, KY),
a corporate and product brand identity firm.
Images courtesy of The DeLor Group
Copyright ©2002 MX










