The 18-month federal oversight of four orthopedic device companies has come to an end. The U.S. Attorney’s office in Newark, NJ dismissed criminal charges that the companies paid thousands of dollars to surgeons who used their devices, according to The Star-Ledger. The charges were dropped by U.S. Magistrate Judge Madeline Cox Arleo in Newark.
Back in September 2007, Biomet Orthopedics Inc., Depuy Orthopaedics Inc., and Zimmer Inc. (all Warsaw, IN), along with Smith & Nephew Inc. (Memphis), paid a combined $311 million in settlements and were required to undergo monitoring by the Office of Inspector General for five years as part of corporate integrity agreements. Stryker Orthopedics Inc. (Mahwah, NJ) was also part of an investigation by the Department of Justice, but the company didn’t have to pay a fine, because it was the first to cooperate. Criminal complaints weren’t filed against Stryker either. However, all five companies, which make up almost 95% of the hip and knee implant market, were required to pay for a federal monitor, appointed by the Department of Justice, to oversee their practices for 18 months.
The U.S. Attorney’s office said that federal involvement significantly reduced consulting fees for surgeons, which reached as high as $200,000 a year for promoting orthopedic devices.
“We are confident that the industry, which had been engaged in illegal kickback practices to secure market share, has made significant changes in their practices to strengthen compliance programs, increase compliance staffs, and enhance internal compliance and procedures,” said acting U.S. Attorney Ralph Marra in a statement.
“The monitors engaged by the companies were a critical driving force in fully integrating the goals and requirements of the agreements into the companies’ business practices,†said Marra. “These changes will ensure that physician consultants are retained, not for the volume of their business, but for the legitimate consulting services they can provide.â€
The companies made several reforms in the area of compliance, consulting payment processes, and training programs. They included:
• Overhauling consulting arrangements and reducing sales and marketing influence.
• Reorganizing compliance departments—establishing a policy and conducting training and auditing performance.
• Public disclosure of consultants and payment amounts, along with conducting fair market value studies to determine compensation rates.
• Establishing confidential hotlines for complaints concerning improper behavior.
• Funding medical education programs to eliminate conflict of interest.
• Eliminating gifts to healthcare professionals.
• Adopting AdvaMed’s revised Code of Ethics.
According to the U.S. Attorney’s Office, combined consulting payments to surgeons dropped 61% from $272 million in 2007 to $105 million in 2008. The number of doctors receiving payments also declined 63% from 1693 in 2007 to 627 in 2008.

