Skip to : [Content] [Navigation]
 
April 7, 2009
 

Rewarding Devices That Benefit Patients

This year’s entries in the MDEA competition posed a couple of challenges for the judges. First of all, there were many terrific new devices to evaluate. It seems that every year they get a little better, making it hard to decide what not to give an award to, notes Jury Chair Steve Wilcox. Wilcox is principal of Design Science (Philadelphia). The other difficulty, he says, is that there were excellent entries that were extremely simple, and excellent entries that were extremely complex, sometimes in the same category, forcing the judges to wrestle with the “apples and oranges” problem. In the end, the jury tried to evaluate each product on its own merits.

“We gave awards for handling big, complex systems intelligently and awards for coming up with simple, elegant new solutions to old problems,” he says.

The design of medical devices has seen a slow but sure evolution to products designed to reduce the cost of healthcare, which has often led to moving traditional hospital devices to the patient’s home. With that evolution, these devices have also managed to include more functions and empower patients. It was clear that quite a few of this year’s Medical Design Excellence Award winners are leaders of this trend. Others focus squarely on patient safety, with the result being some amazing products that may even seem simple on first glance.

Miniaturization and portability were among the approaches companies used to make devices more convenient for patients. Making them smaller means that the users can go about their daily routines with little disruption. But, this is no small task. These tiny devices, from an in-ear hearing aid to an on-the-nose sleep apnea device, are enabling patients with chronic conditions to function better.

“The products we judged this year consisted of much wider variety than previously submitted,” notes juror Yadin David, PhD. “Products are becoming more user-intuitive with attention to features like human factors engineering and a higher focus on patient safety and process improvement,” he says. David is founder of Biomedical Engineering Consultants LLC (Houston).

Patient—and caregiver—safety is making headlines much more often these days—usually in a negative way. But some of the MDEA-winning devices will be helping to reverse that trend. Devices ranged from one that reduces the occurrence of pressure ulcers to a keyboard that is easy to clean, reducing the risk of bacteria cross-contamination. One of the biggest problems making the news is the increase in hospital-acquired infections. To help reign in the annual cost of treating patients that contract MRSA, hospitals need simple, low-cost tests such as this year’s award winner. From the simple to the complex, though, the overarching trend was certainly reducing the cost of healthcare.

Sherrie Conroy
sherrie.conroy@cancom.com

 
 

MDEA 2009
Designing with Hospitals In Mind
By Heather Thompson
Preventing wrong-side surgeries and reducing the incidence of hospital-acquired infections are just some of the solutions that new technology provides.


MDEA 2009
Returning Control to Patients
By Lawrence Lloyd
Some MDEA–winning devices limit patients’ time in the hospital and help conceal their conditions.

 
 

Pumps and Valves
The Benefits of Borrowed IFP Expertise

By Steve Szabo and Randy Rieken
Instead of tying up their own resources, many companies are turning to suppliers for help with integrated fluidic platforms (IFPs).



Technology Development
Communication Breakdown: Why Software Partnerships Fail

By Andrew Dallas
Medical device makers often find their relationships with software consulting firms unsatisfactory.

 

BIOMEDevice
April 22–23, 2009 | Boston Convention & Exhibition Center, Boston, MA
Attend New England’s new MD&M event! The BIOMEDevice exposition will include 300 leading suppliers to the medical device industry and the nation’s top resources for biopharmaceutical and medical device design and manufacturing. For complete event details including expo hall highlights, a current list of exhibitors, information on the co-located BIOMEDevice Executive Forum, and easy online registration for free expo hall admission, visit
www.BIOMEDeviceBoston.com

 
Audit Process
The Paper vs. On-Site Decision

By Ames Gross and John Minot
Japanese regulators could decide to skip the paper-only route and pay a personal visit to your manufacturing site.
 
 
 
Game-Changing Devices
Help MD&DI identify the 30 devices that have most shaped the industry. You can vote for the deserving technology here.


Instead of fearing CAPA violations, Barbara Immel explains how manufacturers can get the most of out their system.


Industry Addresses the Economy
MD&DI asked MD&M West attendees whether the financial crunch was affecting their companies. Hear what they had to say.


Reining in the Supply Chain
Bill Hook identifies the issues manufacturers must face to keep their supply chain primed for the future. 

 

Send your suggestions, comments, and inquiries to the editors.

Subscription Information:
For more information about subscribing to MD&DI,
click here.

Advertising Information:
For more information about advertising in MD&DI or in the MD&DI E-Mail Update, contact the
publisher.