PROCESSING TECHNOLOGIES
Figure 1. (click to enlarge) LabCD cap valve. The two inlet streams entering from the left and right are mixed and then directed out the top channel.
|
In the 1980s and 1990s, other components were added to MEMS such as optical and mechanical sensors. New materials, primarily plastics, were developed to decrease production costs and increase ruggedness of MEMS. Such new microdevices depended on microfluidics to move fluids through them in order to perform specific functions.
Microfluidics is a method of moving small volumes (less than 1 ml) of liquid through microstructures such as channels, valves, and gates. Microfluidic devices include fluid control devices, ink-jet printing, gas and fluid measurement devices, and medical devices such as implantable drug pumps. IVD and analytical microfluidic devices include nucleic acid and protein microarrays, and devices designed for specific biochemical and immunoassay applications.
In 2006, the market for all microfluidic devices generated approximately $4 billion in revenues. By 2010, this market is predicted to grow to $6.3 billion, with an average annual growth rate of 12%. Sales of microfluidic devices in the medical and life science market were approximately $375 million in 2006. This market segment is projected to grow at an annual rate of 25% to $800 million by 2010. The increased proportion of microfluidic devices in medical applications from 8% in 2006 to 13% in 2010 will be primarily due to the growth of microfluidic diagnostic and analytical applications.
Microfluidics Basics
Microfluidics provides another method for performing molecular diagnostics measurements and assays for clinical diagnosis, drug discovery, screening, environmental analysis, and food testing. The primary distinction is that microfluidic assays require only microliters to nanoliters of sample volume. This distinction can result in the following: conservation of samples and reagents, reduced liquid use, handling, and waste, rapid mixing and reaction (from seconds to minutes), potential for higher assay sensitivity and throughput (e.g., arraying, multiplexing, many samples per assay or many assays per sample), smaller and easier to use systems, and cost savings. However, microfluidics alone cannot increase sensitivity beyond the assay’s inherent sensitivity nor improve the assay of a sample with low analyte concentrations.
Microfluidic devices include the following basic features: channels through which a fluid moves, gates and valves that regulate the direction of flow, and a force or pressure that provides the energy to move the fluid through the channels.
Channel length and width can be varied to act as valves and mixers. For example, if the diameter of a channel gets smaller, more pressure is needed to move the fluid from a larger to a smaller channel.
The two basic types of microfluidic valves are passive and active. Passive microvalves control a liquid’s flow by nonmechanical means, manipulating valve shape and geometry, to slow down or speed up flow.
![]() |
Figure 2. LabCD serpentine channels for premixing of reagents/
samples prior to reaching a final mixing chamber. |
Active microvalves are pressure-activated mechanical devices that modify the flow of a fluid through the valve. Active microvalves contain components common to all valves: the body, a valve seat to manipulate the fluid (open, closed, or a gradient), and an actuator to control the valve seat’s position. The actuator in an active microvalve is the most critical component that determines the microvalve’s function and reliability. Active microvalves can be digital (only open and closed) or analog (proportional flow control from off to on).
Force is required to move fluid through a microfluidic device. Force can be delivered by using mechanical, magnetic, or electrical pumps.1 Force can also be delivered by moving fluids through the device using centrifugal force, such as spinning the aparatus. The latter is the basis for LabCD.
Fabricating microfluidic devices utilizes methods such as photolithography, chemical vapor deposition, micromachining, and soft embossing to develop the basic device design. This design can be the basis for developing molds that can be used for production runs applying methods such as injection molding. Injection molding combined with specialized but inexpensive plastics (e.g., polymethacrylates, polycarbonate, and polysulfone) can produce thousands of devices with high reproducibility at low unit costs in a production run.
Examples of Microfluidic Systems
Table I. (click to enlarge) Examples of microfluidic analysis and diagnostic systems.
|
For example, one of the first microfluidic systems for nanoliter DNA sample analysis used an integrated silicone chip.2 The device integrates electrophoretic separation, DNA amplification, and fluorescence detection of DNA concentrations as low as 10 ng/ml in 1–2 minutes on a device that is 47 × 5 × 1 mm.
Microfluidic lab-on-a-chip technologies have been applied to various diagnostic and analytical applications. Such applications range from miniaturizing older technologies such as capillary electrophoresis to developing new means for rapid sample analysis in the laboratory (e.g., the GeneXpert system by Cepheid) and point-of-care analysis (e.g., lab cards for cancer and infectious agents by Micronics) (see Table I).
As with any new and emerging technology area, many of the products listed in Table I are still being developed and are not yet available as routine, reproducible assays or methods. However, they represent a new approach to analyzing and diagnosing biological materials which will increase sample throughput in less time and, as they evolve, decrease costs compared with current diagnostic and analytical methods.
Centrifugal Microfluidic Platform
LabCD is a microfluidic reaction platform that uses centrifugal force to move, mix, and react reagents and samples, and to isolate or amplify specific macromolecules such as DNA or proteins. Enzyme reactions and immunoassays produce end products that can be detected and quantified using standard colorimetric or fluorimetric detectors. Isolation or amplification results in end products that can be recovered for further analysis.
In 1996, Gamera Bioscience Corp. (Medford, MA) filed the first patent covering the LabCD centrifugal microfluidic technology, which is protected by more than 60 issued and pending patents.3 The technology was developed to overcome the limitations of microfluidic platforms associated with valving, system integration, performance reproducibility, and high manufacturing costs.
To date, the LabCD platform has been applied to specific molecular analysis and diagnostic systems including the following: nucleic acid amplification (e.g., polymerase chain reaction [PCR]), immunoassays, enzymatic and cell assays, plasmid DNA and protein preparation, diabetes testing, serum protein binding, on-disc hepatocyte drug metabolism assays, and protein crystallization.4–6 In 2001 and 2003, the first commercialized LabCD products, the LabCD-48 and LabCD-96 ADMET systems for drug discovery, were introduced and provided an automated, rapid platform for assessing the toxicity of drug candidates on cytochrome P450 (CyP) enzymes.7
LabCD was the first microfluidic diagnostic platform to use a soft embossing method for initial disc development.8 In this method, the original disc design master is tooled out of a polymeric plastic by using a combination of photolithography and computer-controlled machining. A high-durometer silicone rubber is poured into the master to produce a flexible elastomer negative containing all the original microfluidic features. The elastomeric negative produces as many as 50 thermoplastic discs per day using hot embossing.
This approach allows for rapid prototyping and changes in the disc design as the assay on the disc is optimized. Once the design is finalized, metal mold inserts can be assembled to produce hundreds of discs per day using injection molding. For example, the LabCD-96 disc for ADMET assays can be produced by injection molding in daily lots of 500 discs.
A LabCD can be loaded with sample reagents by using either manual multichannel pipettes or automated liquid-handling platforms such as the Tecan Genesis or Gemini Systems by Tecan (Mannedorf, Switzerland). Specialized versions of the latter systems have been modified to allow automated runs of up to 24 discs from initial reagent/sample loading to end product detection and data output.
![]() |
Figure 3. Tecan Gemini System for LabCD. Discs are loaded by a 8-channel automated pipette and then moved to the incubator (back stacks) or spinner-reader (right) as required for the assay.
|
LabCD still needs to be further developed before being widely accepted as a new diagnostic platform technology, in particular the final design and production of discs for generic assays such as immunoassay and nucleic acid isolation and characterization. A simpler, cheaper spinner-reader instrument that is within the cost constraints of clinical and academic labs is also needed.
Diagnostic Applications
Table II. (click to enlarge) LabCD assays and methods.
|
- On-disc integration of all assay and method steps.
- No moving parts: all valving, mixing, and movement of reagents and samples are driven by programmed steps of increasing centrifugal force.
- Time to reaction product or purified sample of 5–25 minutes for assays, and 10–25 minutes for extraction of DNA or proteins.
- Total reaction volumes of 4–20 µl.
- On-disc quantification of colorimetric or fluorescent reaction products.
- From 12 to 96 simultaneous assays or procedures.
- Inexpensive, plastic, disposable platforms.
- Directly adaptable to automated liquid-handling instruments.
- Common spin-detector unit and software for programming and controlling disc function.
The key to LabCD is eliminating the moving parts. Mechanical gates or valves are unnecessary on LabCD since all movement is controlled through channels and valves of varying diameters. Movement into and through a specific channel or valve is a function of diameter and applied centrifugal force. Accurate volumes (±0.1%) can be delivered to reaction chambers using this principle.
Figure 4. (click to enlarge) LabCD metering valve.
|
![]() |
Figure 5. LabCD-96 disc. While
originally developed for ADMET assays, the disc can be used for any assay requiring two reactant solutions. |
For example, a LabCD-48 disc that is able to carry out 48 simultaneous, two-chamber assays was used to develop a generic displacement assay system applicable to receptor-ligand and antibody-antigen binding assays.8 The initial target for this assay was the binding of drugs to serum-binding proteins and, specifically, subdomains IIA and IIIA of human serum albumin (HSA) and human alpha-1 acid glycoprotein (ACP). Drug binding to these proteins can alter the pharmacology of the drugs.
It has become a routine diagnostic process in early drug discovery to characterize the binding of new drug entities to these proteins using displacement reactions. The current methods use equilibrium dialysis followed by liquid chromatography/mass spectroscopy, or spectrophotometric or microtiter plate assays.
Figure 6. (click to enlarge) Basis for the LabCD Serum Binding Protein Assay. Displacement of the fluorescent probe by a drug leads to a decrease in fluorescence. The same approach and disc can be used for immunoassay and receptor-ligand assays.
|
Microfluidic Diabetes Panel
Figure 7. (click to enlarge) LabCD Diabetes Panel for simultaneous determination of glucose, total hemoglobin, and glycated hemoglobin in blood.
|
Referring to Figure 7, as the sample enters the disc (a), metered blood samples are taken for Hb (b) and glucose analysis (c, f). Glucose is determined with a standard colorimetric assay such as hexokinase/glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase/NADP or glucose oxidase/peroxidase on a nylon matrix pad (g). The result is a colored product proportional to glucose concentration. The reaction product absorbance is read directly from the pad and quantitates glucose present in the fixed volume sampled. The Hb sample is lysed (i–k), and a sample is taken (l–n) for affinity chromatography on a boronate support (o) which retains the glycated Hb. NGHb is washed into a series of cuvettes (r) for colorimetric determination at 430 nm. Total Hb is determined from the lysed sample (m), and glycated Hb can be determined by subtracting the amount of NGHb found from total Hb found.
The entire procedure from sample addition to result takes approximately 15–20 minutes at centrifugal speeds starting at 50 rpm and ending at 3000 rpm. Colorimetric determinations are made with the LabCD spinner-reader. Each disc has four assay arrays enabling four simultaneous blood analyses.
Table III . (click to enlarge) Comparison of the LabCD diabetes panel with commercial diagnostic tests.
|
Focus on Genomics
Figure 8. (click to enlarge) LabCD Plasmid DNA Extraction Disc.
|
Figure 9. (click to enlarge) Gel electrophoresis of plasmid DNA extracted on LabCD compared to a commercial
extraction method. |
Up to four individual plasmid isolation units can be placed on a single LabCD disc. As with the other LabCD assays, the LabCD plasmid disc requires less sample and reagent volumes than those needed for DNA extraction in current methods. This LabCD can also complete the extraction faster, in an automated sample-in, product-out format.
The development of the LabCD plasmid disc and a modified disc for isolation of genomic DNA from blood led to the development of a combined DNA extraction and PCR amplification disc: the LabCD-PCR Plus disc. This LabCD can contain up to 16 DNA extraction and amplification units by using 5–10 µl of sample (e.g., blood, culture, etc.), and can complete the entire process in 20–30 minutes depending on the number of PCR cycles. A number of studies have described the design and function of this disc. 6,9,10
Samples (5 µl) of a culture or biological fluid are applied to the disc. Using a dedicated spin program, the samples are lysed in 5 µl of 10 mM NaOH at 95°C for 1 minute to release DNA and denature proteins. The DNA solution is neutralized with 5 µl of 16 mM tris-HCl (pH 7.5), and mixed with 8–10 µl of PCR reagents and primers. The DNA is amplified on the disc with thermister heating elements on a spinning platen containing two thermoelectric devices for each assay. A disc can hold up to 16 individual microfluidic structures, allowing for 16 simultaneous amplification reactions.
Figure 10. (click to enlarge) On-disc extraction and amplification of E. coli genomic DNA. The disc-amplified DNA was identical to DNA amplified using a standard thermocycler method.
|
Conclusion
![]() |
Richard F. Taylor, PhD, is president of TC Associates Inc. (West Boxford, MA), an independent technical and management consulting firm focusing on diagnostic and pharmaceutical markets. He can be reached at tcadtaylor@cs.com.
|
The LabCD described in this article addresses and meets these challenges by having no moving parts and depending only on centrifugal force to drive the assay reactions. These attributes have also enabled transfer of LabCD designs to mass production by injection molding, producing thousands of reproducible discs in production runs. Linked to an automated liquid-handling and detection system, LabCD has established that microfluidics can be applied to a wide range of IVD and analysis systems.
References
1. NT Nguyen and ST Wereley, Fundamentals and Applications of Microfluidics (Boston: Artech House, 2002).
2. MA Burns et al., “An Integrated Nanoliter DNA Analysis Device,” Science 282, no. 10 (1998): 484–487.
3. A Milan, SG Kieffer-Higgins, and GD Corey, Devices and methods for using centripetal acceleration to drive fluid movement in a microfluidics system, U.S. Patent 6,319,469, issued 2001.
4. MJ Mandou and GJ Kellogg, “The LabCD: A Centrifuge-Based Microfluidic Platform for Diagnostics,” in Proceedings – Society of Photo-Optical Engineers 3259 (1997): 80–93.
5. GJ Kellogg et al., “Centrifugal Microfluidics: Applications,” in Micro Total Analysis Systems 2000, ed. A van den Berg, W Olthius, and P Bergveld (Amsterdam: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2000): 239–242.
6. RF Taylor, “LabCD: A Centrifugal Microfluidics Platform for Rapid Enzyme, Nucleic Acid, and Immunoassays,” in Proceedings Oak Ridge Conference (2006): 135–151.
7. EA Schilling et al., “LabCD-96: A Miniaturized Centrifugal Microfluidic System for Biochemical Assays,” in Micro Total Analysis Systems 2004, ed. A van den Berg, W Olthius, and P Bergveld (Amsterdam: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2004): 303–305.
8. BL Cavalho, Elastomer tools for the fabrication of elastomeric devices and uses thereof, U.S. Patent Application 2004/0241049A1, filed 2003.
9. G Kellogg et al., Devices and methods for using centripetal acceleration to drive fluid movement in microfluidics system for performing biological fluid assays, U.S. Patent 6,632,399, filed 1999, issued 2003.
10. G Kellogg et al., A microfluidics system for performing in vitro hybridization and amplification of nucleic acids, U.S. Patent Application 2000/9570490, filed 2000.







