Originally Published IVD Technology April 2001
Detection Technologies
Mediated electrochemical detection of nucleic acids for drug discovery and clinical diagnosticsMediated oxidation of guanine residues is a rapid and sensitive method for the direct detection of nucleic acids.
Natasha D. Popovich
Natasha D. Popovich,
PhD, is the manager of electrochemical instrumentation at Xanthon
Inc. (Research Triangle Park, NC). She can be reached by e-mail at npopovich@ xanthon.com. Genomics, the science of discovering, locating,
and characterizing genes in organisms, has grown explosively over the
past decade.1 This growth has been spurred in part by the
strong interest of the diagnostic and pharmaceutical industries in using
genomic information to restructure the methods for identifying disease
states, implementing diagnostic tests, and developing more-specific
therapeutic agents. Massive gene-sequencing efforts have culminated
in the recent completion of a rough draft of the sequence of the human
genome, a major milestone that represents the beginning of a new genomic
era.2, 3 Over the long term, this information will have a
profound effect not only on healthcare but also on the quality of life
in general. As more genetic information is becoming available,
those within the pharmaceutical and diagnostics industries are experiencing
an ever-increasing need for rapid and accurate methods to detect and
quantitate nucleic acids. Extensive libraries of potential drug compounds
have been compiled using combinatorial chemistry. A high-throughput
gene-expression-analysis product is needed to screen these libraries
against gene targets associated with certain disease conditions. Nucleic
acidbased diagnostic assays also have broad potential in the clinical
setting for cancer detection, immune-status testing, infectious-disease
diagnosis, and measurement of drug resistance or susceptibility.
Traditionally, gene-expression analysis has been
performed using such methods as Northern blots, ribonuclease protection
assays (RPA), or reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR).
However, these methods are not well suited for testing large numbers
of samples because they are time-consuming and laborious, and in some
instances lack adequate sensitivity. Several new products for detection of specific
nucleic acid sequences are either on the market or under development.4
The majority are designed to detect the presence or absence of a specific
nucleic acid molecule of interest through its hybridization to a complementary
sequence (probe nucleic acid) immobilized on a solid phase that is interfaced
with a detection device. To detect hybridization, these methods require
the attachment of a fluorescent, radioactive, enzymatic, or chemiluminescent
label to the target nucleic acid. The procedures used to label the nucleic
acid and the instrumentation needed to detect some types of labels can
make these products complex and cumbersome to use. In addition, amplification of the target nucleic
acid using PCR or a related technique is generally required to detect
small quantities of a specific nucleic acid using currently available
detection methods. This extra step increases the time required to perform
the assay and introduces the possibility of sample contamination and
other errors during the amplification procedure. Electrochemical detection of nucleic acids has
generated considerable interest because electrochemical methods offer
high sensitivity while using relatively inexpensive instruments and
simple protocols. DNA hybridization has been successfully detected electrochemically
using direct oxidation of DNA over an electrode and indirectly through
detection of redox-active hybridization indicators that bind more strongly
to duplex DNA than to single-stranded DNA.5, 6 However, the signal obtained from DNA using these
methods is small and therefore significantly limits the sensitivity
of these methods. This problem can be overcome by using an electrochemical
mediator to extract electrons from guanine residues in DNA or RNA and
carry them to the electrode, where the mediator is regenerated and can
participate in additional electron-transfer events.7 This
approach is the basis of the technology used at Xanthon Inc. (Research
Triangle Park, NC), and is the topic of this article. Principles of Mediated Nucleic Acid Oxidation
Mediated oxidation of guanine residues is a rapid
and sensitive method for directly detecting nucleic acids. To implement
this approach, nucleic acid probes are covalently bound to a tin-doped
indium oxide (ITO) electrode. The electrodes are then exposed to a sample
containing target DNA or RNA. The complementary nucleic acid hybridizes
to the nucleic acid probe, and noncomplementary nucleic acid sequences
are subsequently removed by washing. The nucleic acid hybrid is then
detected using a redox-active mediator with an appropriate redox potential,
such as tris (2,2'-bipyridyl) ruthenium (II) (Ru(bpy)32+).
In the first step of this catalytic guanine oxidation,
the mediator is oxidized to the +3 form (Ru(bpy)33+)
by the high positive potential of the electrode: Ru(bpy)32+ Æ
Ru(bpy)33+ + e The oxidized form of the mediator then abstracts
an electron from guanine in the hybridized nucleic acid target to form
a radical cation that can undergo further reactions: Ru(bpy)33+ + NA Æ
Ru(bpy)32+ + NAox
The regenerated reduced mediator is again oxidized
at the electrode, completing a catalytic cycle. The current produced
during each oxidation of Ru(bpy)32+ is measured
and reflects the amount of guanine present in the nucleic acid target
hybridized at the electrode. In contrast to direct oxidation of nucleic
acid at an electrode, electron-transfer reactions between Ru(bpy)32+
and guanine, as well as between Ru(bpy)32+and
the ITO electrode, are very fast. The major reason for the rapid electron
transfer between Ru(bpy)32+ and guanine (the second-order
rate constant has been measured to be roughly 1 ¥ 106 M1
s1) is that the oxidation potential of guanine is almost
identical to that of Ru(bpy)32+.8
The catalytic nature of the mediated electron
transfer yields current values that are much larger than those obtained
using nonmediated electron-transfer reactions involving nucleic acids.
This makes possible the detection of low copy numbers without amplification.
Because detection is based on the oxidation of guanine residues, RNA
can be detected in the same manner as DNA, without using reverse transcription
to form cDNA. Eliminating these extra preparative steps simplifies the
assay procedure and can improve the accuracy and reliability of the
detection method. In order to minimize background signal in the
mediated electron-transfer system, it is preferable that the nucleic
acid probes not contain guanine. When a probe sequence for a specific
target nucleic acid that contains only adenine, cytosine, and thymine
is not available, guanine bases in the probe can be substituted with
hypoxanthine, because it is less reactive than guanine in the electron-transfer
reaction with Ru(bpy)32+. Since hypoxanthine can
form only two of the three hydrogen bonds in a Watson-Crick base pair,
other guanine derivatives such as 7-deazaguanine may also be viable
and attractive alternatives.9 Electrochemical Interrogation For development purposes, cyclic voltammetry
is the electrochemical method of choice for the nucleic aciddetection
system described here. This method provides information on the mechanism
and kinetics of the electrochemical reaction of interest, as well as
quantitative information. In cyclic voltammetry, a potentiostat is used
to apply a potential to the working electrode with respect to the reference
electrode, whose potential is well defined and constant during the experiment.
The potential of the working electrode is increased linearly with time
to a specified value at a constant rate. When the specified value is
reached, the potential is then reversed to the starting point at the
same rate. This change in potential is the electrochemical driving force
that causes oxidation or reduction of the analyte. The current resulting
from these events is measured and recorded in a voltammogram, which
is a plot of current as a function of the potential applied to the working
electrode. Figure 1 shows cyclic voltam-mograms obtained
at ITO electrodes modified with an inosine-substituted oligonucleotide
probe with varying amounts of hybridized target nucleic acid as determined
radiochemically. Hybridization of the complementary target to the probe
results in a significant current enhancement over background. As expected,
the current observed increases with increasing amounts of guanine at
the electrode surface. The current response is a linear function of
the amount of the target nucleic acid over the range examined (11000
fmol) at 6-mm-diam ITO electrodes. The amount of signal generated by
noncomplementary target nonspecifically bound in the system is minimal
because of careful design of the solid phase, lysis and hybridization
solution, and wash reagents. In the Xanthon system, low nonspecific binding
of sample components and extensive posthybridization washes enable the
detection of target nucleic acid from whole-cell lysate without purification.
The minimal sample preparation required is one of the main advantages
of the Xanthon technology, since it offers substantial time savings
and reduces the experimental error introduced during complex processing
steps. Another desirable attribute of electrochemical
biosensors for nucleic acid diagnostics is that they are well suited
for miniaturization. Besides allowing for smaller sample volumes, microelectrodes
offer improved sensitivity over macroelectrodes because of their ability
to detect low currents with better discrimination against the charging
current. Charging current results from the reorganization of the electrode-solution
interface when potential is applied, and can be a major source of background
in electrochemical experiments.10 ITO electrodes to be used in the Xanthon system
have a 200-µm diam, reduced from the original 6-mm diam, and are
produced using microfabrication and photolithographic procedures. Representative
cyclic voltammograms at these electrodes showing the oxidation current
obtained for attomole levels of guanine, as well as the background current,
are given in Figure 2. The peak current is linearly proportional to
the amount of guanine at the electrode surface. As can be seen in Figure
2, 43 amol of strand (215 amol of guanine) are easily distinguished
from background. Thus, whereas detection limits of the mediated electrochemical
detection method on macroelectrodes (electrode area = 0.28 cm2)
are at the low femtomole level, they decrease to low attomole levels
as the assay is scaled down to a smaller electrode size (electrode area
= 3.14 ¥ 104 cm2). Data such as those shown in Figure 2 are generated
using cyclic voltammetry where the amount of signal obtained is a function
of scan rate. Thus, the time spent at the peak potential is limited
and does not allow for complete oxidation of guanine residues present
at the electrode surface. The Xanthon system will use chronoamperometry
versus cyclic voltammetry as a detection method, because it allows for
collection of the maximum signal out of each guanine molecule and it
involves only a single potential step, making it easier to implement.
In this method, the potential of the working
electrode is stepped from a value where no electron-transfer reaction
occurs (for example, 0 mV) to a potential where the mediator is oxidized
(1100 mV) and therefore able to extract electrons from guanine. The
working electrode is held at the step potential for a specified period,
and the current measured as a function of time. The signal associated
with target nucleic acid is obtained by integrating the current measured
during a specified period, resulting in charge passed as a result of
guanine oxidation, which is linearly proportional to the amount of guanine
at the electrode surface. Product Formats and Applications One of the major features of the Xanthon technology
is that it can readily be adapted to a variety of assay formats, including
biochips for genomic re-search, handheld devices for point-of-care medical
diagnostics, and microplates for drug discovery. The initial product is designed for gene-expression
analysis. In order to minimize the need for changes in existing instrumentation
and to ensure easy integration into the pharmaceutical drug-discovery
process, the first product will be presented in a 96-well microplate
format. A schematic of the Xanthon Xpression Analysis Plate is shown
in Figure 3. Each well of the plate contains seven 200-µm working
electrodes, six derivatized with immobilized probes selected by the
individual customers including one probe to serve as a positive control;
and one electrode to act as negative control. Inclusion of both a positive
and a negative control in each well will permit adjustment for cell-culture
variables, thus helping to ensure the integrity of the data.
The interrogation period is extremely short and
allows for 5-minute processing time per plate, enabling users to collect
approximately 138,000 data points per day, plus 55,000 controls. This
product is suited for the lead optimization phase of the drug-discovery
process because it allows customers to evaluate the impact of a large
number of test compounds on the expression levels of a selected set
of target genes. The Xanthon product is designed for analysis
of cells cultured in 96-well microplates (typically 50,000 cells per
well). Following exposure to test compounds, cells are washed and lysed
using a proprietary lysis and hybridization solution. Then 50 µl
of the lysate is transferred to a well of a Xanthon Xpression Analysis
Plate, where hybridization of the target nucleic acid to the probe immobilized
at the electrode surface occurs. After hybridization, the wells are
washed to remove unhybridized materials, the mediator solution is added,
and electrochemical interrogation is performed. The Xanthon Xpression Analysis System is capable
of multiplexing because the signal generated is localized within each
electrode. In the present electrode layout, there is no cross talk between
the electrodes, and the number of electrodes per well could be increased
significantly. Figure 4 illustrates interrogation of one well of the
96-well microplate using the Xanthon HT96/7 instrument and software.
In this experiment, electrodes 14 had a probe complementary to
the target nucleic acid, while the probe immobilized on electrodes 57
was noncomplementary to the target. It is clear that hybridization occurred
only at electrodes with the complementary probe, resulting in a significant
increase in the charge obtained at these electrodes over background.
Figure 4. Interrogation of one well
of a Xanthon Xpression Analysis Plate. In the Xanthon instrument, each electrode will
be interrogated three times. During the first interrogation, all of
the guanine at the electrode surface is oxidized, while the second and
third interrogation provide background information for each electrode.
Thus, each electrode provides its own internal control, resulting in
a high degree of reliability and accuracy. The Xanthon HT96/7 is a compact instrument that
will be a common platform for all of the company's products incorporating
the 96-well microplate format (see Figure 5). The instrument consists
of a robotic arm for plate handling and the plate-reader circuitry.
It provides automated reading of the Xanthon Xpression Analysis Plate
plus extensive data analysis capability, including an option to export
the data to existing laboratory information systems as an ASCII file.
Instrument cost is low relative to comparable
instruments required for use with optical-based detection methods. Prior
to market introduction, the integrated Xanthon system will be independently
tested at five different sites to validate its performance characteristics
when compared with other gene-expression analysis methods, such as RT-PCR,
RPA, or Northern blots. Mediated electrochemical detection of nucleic
acid provides distinct advantages over existing methods for expression
analysis. Multiple targets can be analyzed from a single sample using
a highly automated system that requires minimal sample handling and
uses direct detection of the target nucleic acid. In addition, the system
described here is adaptable for the simultaneous detection of nucleic
acids (expression analysis) and proteins using mediated electrochemistry
on the same instrument platform. The ability to detect levels of expressed
mRNA and corresponding protein in the same sample using the same detection
technique would provide a wealth of information inaccessible by other
methods. Conclusion The age of genomics is here, with advances in
science opening the door to new approaches to drug discovery, as well
as more powerful and efficient nucleic acidbased diagnostic tools.
Genomic-based drug discovery will enable the development of therapeutic
agents with high specificity for a given disease target. Availability
of these therapeutics will, in turn, drive the need for genomic-based
diagnostics that can specifically identify these disease targets.
Because it is a simple and rapid method applicable
to the detection of unlabeled DNA and RNA, as well as proteins in the
same sample, the detection system described here has broad applications
and will have a significant impact on the way drug discovery is conducted,
diagnostic testing is performed, and test results are used to select
specific therapeutic approaches. REFERENCES 1. C Henke, "DNA-Chip Technologies,
Part 1: Research Fundamentals and Industry Catalysts," IVD Technology
4, no. 5 (1998): 2832.
2. JC Venter et al., "The Sequence
of the Human Genome," Science 291 (2001): 13041351.
3. The Genome International Sequencing
Consortium, "Initial Sequencing and Analysis of the Human Genome," Nature
409 (2001): 860921.
4. EK Wilson, "Instant DNA Detection,"
Chemical Engineering News 76 (1998): 4749.
5. SR Mikkelsen, "Electrochemical
Biosensors for DNA Sequence Detection," Electroanalysis 8 (1996):
1519.
6. J Wang et al., "Electrochemical Measurement
of Oligonucleotides in the Presence of Chromosomal DNA Using Membrane-Covered
Carbon Electrodes," Analytical Chemistry 69 (1993): 40564059.
7. HH Thorp, "Cutting Out the Middleman:
DNA Biosensors Based on Electrochemical Oxidation," Trends in Biotechnology
16 (1998): 117121.
8. M Sistaire, R Holmberg, and HH Thorp,
"Electrochemical Studies of Polynucleotide Binding and Oxidation by
Metal Complexes: Effects of Scan Rate, Concentration, and Sequence,"
Journal of Physical Chemistry 103 (1999): 1071810728.
9. ME Napier et al., "Probing Biomolecule
Recognition with Electron Transfer: Electrochemical Sensors for DNA
Hybridization," Bioconjugate Chemistry 8 (1997): 906913.
10. AC Michael and RM Wightman, "Microelectrodes,"
in Laboratory Techniques in Electroanalytical Chemistry, ed.
P Kissinger and W Heinemann (New York: Marcel Dekker, 1999), 367
402.
Copyright ©2001 IVD Technology

In
gene-expression analysis, the amount of a specific messenger RNA (mRNA)
produced in drug-treated or diseased cells is measured and compared
with the amount found in corresponding untreated healthy cells. Observed
changes in the level of expression of genes of interest that occur in
diseased cells, and their response to drug treatment, can then be used
to guide the selection of drug candidates for further development, to
elucidate the mechanisms of drug action, and ultimately to assist in
the selection of patients for inclusion in preclinical or clinical trials.

Figure 1. Detection of hybridized
nucleic acid with cyclic voltammetry. Guanine in the capture probe
was substituted by hypoxanthine. The amount of the target nucleic
acid varied between 108 and 593 fmol and was determined radiochemically.
Scan rate of 20 V/sec was used for interrogation. Electrode size
was 0.28 cm2.

Figure 2. Cyclic voltammograms
illustrating a dose response for varying amounts of guanine at a
200-µm ITO electrode. The probe used was a 21-mer with five
guanines. The amount of the attached probe was determined radiochemically.
Scan rate of 20 V/sec was used for interrogation.

Figure 3. Schematic of the Xanthon Xpression Analysis Plate.





